Radeon HD 7670 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

CPU

GPU

Radeon HD 7670

2012Core: 600 MHz

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon HD 7670

803

+0.4%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

800

0.0%

Arc A310

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7670 is positioned at rank #401 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670

#391

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1352%

#393

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1226%

#394

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1222%

#398

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1112%

#399

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1104%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#403

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#404

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

94%

#408

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

91%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

90%

#412

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

89%

#413

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

89%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

89%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

Insight	Radeon HD 7670	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7670 Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score	803	800
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Gen. 12
Process Node	40 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	480+2900%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 7670 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 100% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP	45W	15W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Integrated
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	17.8	53.3+199%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).