Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R9 M280X

AMD

Radeon HD 7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7670

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 146.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

  • 113.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M280X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 113.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (814 vs 803), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.6% (8.0 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M280X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670Radeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score
803
814+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
2048+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+611%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
48 KB
512 KB+967%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7670Radeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670Radeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7670Radeon R9 M280X
TDP
45W-78%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Perf/Watt
17.8+334%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7670 came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670 was 60% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.0 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 142.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M280X (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7670Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP
$100-60%
$250
Performance per Dollar
8.0+142%
3.3
Codename
Turks
Tahiti
Release
January 5 2012
October 8 2013
Ranking
#870
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.