Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7670

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 194.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M260DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M260DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (817 vs 803), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 194.9% (8.0 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M260DX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7670 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	Radeon R7 M260DX
G3D Mark Score	803	817+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS+5%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	Radeon R7 M260DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260DX carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	Radeon R7 M260DX
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	Radeon R7 M260DX
TDP	45W-40%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	17.8+63%	10.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7670 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.0 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 196.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260DX (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	8.0+196%	2.7
Codename	Turks	Opal
Release	January 5 2012	December 6 2015
Ranking	#870	#878

Search Radeon HD 7670 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.