
Radeon HD 7670 vs GeForce GT 730M

Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 730M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7670 is positioned at rank 401 and the GeForce GT 730M is on rank 203, so the GeForce GT 730M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $45), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 79.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+79.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670 and GeForce GT 730M

Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

GeForce GT 730M
The GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 807 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the GeForce GT 730M reaches 807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 730M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 384 (GeForce GT 730M). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 803 | 807 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.7427 TFLOPS+29% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB+50% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 730M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 730M's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 350W (GeForce GT 730M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.8+11% | 16.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7670 costs 44.4% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 17.9 (GeForce GT 730M) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 79.3% better value. The GeForce GT 730M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-44% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.1+79% | 17.9 |
| Codename | Turks | GK107 |
| Release | January 5 2012 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #870 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















