Radeon HD 7670 vs GRID M10-0Q

Radeon HD 7670

2012Core: 600 MHz

GRID M10-0Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon HD 7670

803

+0.9%

796

0.0%

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7670 is positioned at rank 401 and the GRID M10-0Q is on rank 389, so the GRID M10-0Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670

#391

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1352%

#393

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1226%

#394

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1222%

#398

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1112%

#399

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1104%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#403

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#404

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

94%

#408

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

91%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

90%

#412

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

89%

#413

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

89%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

89%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q

#374

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

36932%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

100%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

95%

#391

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

95%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

87%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

80%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

80%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

77%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

75%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

60%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

60%

#400

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

60%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

57%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

57%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-0Q.

Insight	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $150), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 505.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+505.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7670 Benchmark Check

GRID M10-0Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670 and GRID M10-0Q

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the GRID M10-0Q reaches 796 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M10-0Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 640 (GRID M10-0Q). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
G3D Mark Score	803	796
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480	640+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS+190%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	48 KB	320 KB+567%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-0Q has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7670) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the GRID M10-0Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 350W (GRID M10-0Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670	GRID M10-0Q
TDP	45W-80%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	17.8+409%	3.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The Radeon HD 7670 costs 83.3% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 505.7% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).