RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-7480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 19.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

  • 96.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 64.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 64.8% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 423), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $35 vs $35, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.8% (19.9 vs 12.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON HD6410D has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON HD6410D scores 423 versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 697 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 64.8%. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score
423
697+65%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
128
2304+1700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5632 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS+936%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+74%
1266 MHz
ROPs
4
32+700%
TMUs
8
144+1700%
L1 Cache
32 KB
576 KB+1700%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
TDP
15W-90%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Perf/Watt
28.2+513%
4.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON HD6410D came in at $35, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 64.5% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP
$35
$35
Performance per Dollar
12.1
19.9+64%
Codename
Dragon Range
Ellesmere
Release
January 3 2023
June 29 2016
Ranking
#843
#305

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.