CPU
GPU
Radeon IGP 320M
Popular choices:
GeForce4 440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon IGP 320M is positioned at rank 412 and the GeForce4 440 is on rank 755, so the Radeon IGP 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon IGP 320M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon IGP 320M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 440 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 320M.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 440 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 440
Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 320M scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440's 5 — the GeForce4 440 leads by 25%. The Radeon IGP 320M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce4 440 uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 384 (GeForce4 440). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+254% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+6% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 1 MB (GeForce4 440) — the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon IGP 320M) vs None (GeForce4 440). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 320M draws 85W versus the GeForce4 440's 33W — a 88.1% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 350W (GeForce4 440). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 33W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon IGP 320M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $469 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM108 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #403 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 440
