Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce4 MX 440SE
Radeon IGP 320M
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 440SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon IGP 320M is positioned at rank #412 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 320M.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 MX 440SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 MX 440SE
Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 320M scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 25%. The Radeon IGP 320M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce4 MX 440SE uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+43% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1575 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon IGP 320M) vs No (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 320M draws 85W versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 25W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 25W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #403 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 MX 440SE
