
Radeon IGP 320M vs RADEON 9000

Radeon IGP 320M
Popular choices:

RADEON 9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon IGP 320M is positioned at rank 412 and the RADEON 9000 is on rank 742, so the Radeon IGP 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 320M and RADEON 9000

Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 320M scores 4 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The Radeon IGP 320M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2900 MHz+132% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon IGP 320M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 has 128 MB. The Radeon IGP 320M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 320M draws 85W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 140% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 15W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Strix Point |
| Release | November 13 2019 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #403 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















