Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon IGP 320M is positioned at rank #412 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M

#397

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

113638%

#412

Radeon IGP 320M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

92%

#415

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

77%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

69%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

62%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

62%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

54%

#421

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

46%

#422

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

46%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

38%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

31%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

15%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

8%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $380

111%

#28

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

MSRP: $269|Avg: $318

110%

#29

Radeon RX 6700 XT

MSRP: $479|Avg: $230

110%

#30

GeForce RTX 3060

MSRP: $329|Avg: $289

110%

#31

Radeon RX 7400

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

109%

#32

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

109%

#33

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

107%

#34

Radeon RX 5300

MSRP: $129|Avg: $50

105%

#35

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

MSRP: $150|Avg: $77

104%

#36

Radeon RX 6400

MSRP: $159|Avg: $139

104%

#37

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

MSRP: $599|Avg: $330

104%

#38

Arc A750

MSRP: $289|Avg: $229

103%

#39

Radeon RX 6800

MSRP: $579|Avg: $370

102%

#40

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $280

101%

#41

Radeon RX 6750 XT

MSRP: $549|Avg: $320

101%

#42

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

MSRP: $799|Avg: $590

100%

#43

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

99%

#44

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

98%

#45

Radeon RX 7600 XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $330

98%

#46

GeForce RTX 2050

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#47

GeForce RTX 3080

MSRP: $699|Avg: $400

96%

#48

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $499|Avg: $449

95%

#49

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP: $549|Avg: $540

94%

#50

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

MSRP: $599|Avg: $600

93%

#51

Radeon RX 7800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $490

92%

#52

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $340

92%

#53

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP: $599|Avg: $550

91%

#54

Radeon RX 7650 GRE

MSRP: $279|Avg: $380

91%

#55

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

MSRP: $470|Avg: $120

90%

#56

Arc A770

MSRP: $349|Avg: $280

89%

#57

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

MSRP: $289|Avg: $423

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 789350% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 320M.

Insight	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-789350%)	✅Leading raw performance (+789350%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon IGP 320M Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 320M scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 789350%. The Radeon IGP 320M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2610 MHz.

Feature	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score	4	31,578+789350%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280	7680+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.2 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS+1153%
Boost Clock	1250 MHz	2610 MHz+109%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	80	240+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon IGP 320M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon IGP 320M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	12 GB+2300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon IGP 320M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

Feature	Radeon IGP 320M	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder	None	NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	None	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon IGP 320M draws 85W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 108.1% difference. The Radeon IGP 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.