Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800
Radeon IGP 320M
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon IGP 320M is positioned at rank 412 and the GeForce4 Ti 4800 is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon IGP 320M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon IGP 320M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 320M.
| Insight | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 Ti 4800
Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon IGP 320M scores 4 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The Radeon IGP 320M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 6+50% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+167% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+138% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+33% | 60 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon IGP 320M) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon IGP 320M draws 85W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 98.5% difference. The Radeon IGP 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon IGP 320M) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-66% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 216mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon IGP 320M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon IGP 320M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GF100 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #403 | #488 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon IGP 320M and GeForce4 Ti 4800
