
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon TM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon TM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon TM better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon TM

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 versus the Radeon TM's 5,564 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 5.2%. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853+5% | 5,564 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2900 MHz+132% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 140% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 15W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 370.9+438% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













