Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon TM

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon TM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

  • 15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon TM better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon TM averages 15.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,853 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon TM is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 85W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon TM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon TM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 15.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (5,564 vs 5,853). G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon TM is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro 5300M still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 5300M is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon TM earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
1080p
low77 FPS93 FPS
medium67 FPS78 FPS
high53 FPS65 FPS
ultra35 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low69 FPS80 FPS
medium60 FPS68 FPS
high42 FPS51 FPS
ultra27 FPS32 FPS
4K
low25 FPS30 FPS
medium24 FPS28 FPS
high15 FPS19 FPS
ultra13 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
1080p
low117 FPS126 FPS
medium82 FPS88 FPS
high56 FPS63 FPS
ultra37 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low78 FPS90 FPS
medium47 FPS60 FPS
high34 FPS44 FPS
ultra25 FPS32 FPS
4K
low37 FPS38 FPS
medium25 FPS28 FPS
high20 FPS22 FPS
ultra14 FPS15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
1080p
low263 FPS250 FPS
medium211 FPS200 FPS
high176 FPS167 FPS
ultra132 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS188 FPS
medium158 FPS150 FPS
high132 FPS125 FPS
ultra99 FPS94 FPS
4K
low132 FPS125 FPS
medium105 FPS100 FPS
high88 FPS83 FPS
ultra62 FPS60 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
1080p
low141 FPS172 FPS
medium113 FPS135 FPS
high97 FPS112 FPS
ultra80 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS118 FPS
medium85 FPS96 FPS
high73 FPS81 FPS
ultra59 FPS64 FPS
4K
low59 FPS71 FPS
medium47 FPS56 FPS
high38 FPS44 FPS
ultra29 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon TM

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 versus the Radeon TM's 5,564 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 5.2%. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
G3D Mark Score
5,853+5%
5,564
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
7 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1280+25%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.2 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2900 MHz+132%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+25%
64
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 140% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5300MRadeon TM
TDP
85W
15W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
68.9
370.9+438%