
Radeon Pro 570 vs Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 155.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+155.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337+2% | 6,208 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 1792+25500% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 570 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 155.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 413.9+684% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 60% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 155.6% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-60% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4+156% | 24.8 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | — |
| Release | June 5 2017 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #382 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















