
Radeon Pro 570 vs FirePro W9000

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

FirePro W9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the FirePro W9000 is on rank 317, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 54.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and FirePro W9000

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337+3% | 6,157 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9000 has 6 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 78.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-56% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 93°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+135% | 22.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 41.0 (FirePro W9000) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 54.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-92% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4+55% | 41.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
| Release | June 5 2017 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #382 | #390 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













