
Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:

Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank 139 and the Arc A530M is on rank 243, so the Radeon Pro V520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro V520.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and Arc A530M

Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,000 | 8,013 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.373 TFLOPS+85% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz+23% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 8 MB (Arc A530M) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.6 | 123.3+246% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Navi 12 | DG2-256 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 1 2023 |
| Ranking | #218 | #317 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















