
Radeon Pro V520 vs Radeon 890M

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:

Radeon 890M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank 139 and the Radeon 890M is on rank 286, so the Radeon Pro V520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 890M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 890M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro V520.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 890M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and Radeon 890M

Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the Radeon 890M reaches 8,175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 890M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1,024 (Radeon 890M). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,000 | 8,175+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.373 TFLOPS+24% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz | 2900 MHz+81% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+125% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 2 MB (Radeon 890M) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12.2 (Radeon 890M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the Radeon 890M's 15W — a 175% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 500W (Radeon 890M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.6 | 545.0+1431% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 890M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Navi 12 | Strix Point |
| Release | December 1 2020 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #218 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















