Radeon Pro V520
VS
GeForce GTX 780

Radeon Pro V520 vs GeForce GTX 780

AMD

Radeon Pro V520

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
90%
#124
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1477%
#139
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
100%
#140
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
100%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
99%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
99%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
98%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
96%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
94%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
92%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
92%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
91%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
91%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro V520 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro V520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro V520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 780 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro V520, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 752.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+752.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and GeForce GTX 780

AMD

Radeon Pro V520

The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the GeForce GTX 780 reaches 7,957 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
G3D Mark Score
8,000
7,957
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.373 TFLOPS+77%
4.156 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1600 MHz+78%
900 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
144
192+33%
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
DirectX
12.1
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.1+10%
1.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
Encoder
VCN 2.0
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
VCN 2.0
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 780's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon Pro V520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
TDP
225W-10%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
35.6+12%
31.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 780 costs 88.3% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.7 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 227.3 (GeForce GTX 780) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 751.3% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520GeForce GTX 780
MSRP
$800
$499-38%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$35-88%
Performance per Dollar
26.7
227.3+751%
Codename
Navi 12
GK110
Release
December 1 2020
May 23 2013
Ranking
#218
#320