
Radeon Pro V520 vs GeForce GTX 780

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V520 is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V520 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro V520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro V520, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 752.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+752.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 and GeForce GTX 780

Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 scores 8,000 and the GeForce GTX 780 reaches 7,957 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780). Raw compute: 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,000 | 7,957 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.373 TFLOPS+77% | 4.156 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz+78% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1+10% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 780's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon Pro V520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V520) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.6+12% | 31.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 780 costs 88.3% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.7 (Radeon Pro V520) vs 227.3 (GeForce GTX 780) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 751.3% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 | GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $499-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $35-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.7 | 227.3+751% |
| Codename | Navi 12 | GK110 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #218 | #320 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















