G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega II vs Radeon RX 6650M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega II vs Radeon RX 6650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6650M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌295.8% higher power demand at 475W vs 120W.

Radeon RX 6650M

2022

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 475W, a 355W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6650M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega II instead at 15,597 vs 15,171, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6650M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro Vega II has no comparable frame-generation support, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro Vega II makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro Vega II is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6650M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro Vega II vs Radeon RX 6650M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega II

The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

Radeon RX 6650M

The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2416 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
G3D Mark Score	15,597+3%	15,171
Architecture	GCN 5.1	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.09 TFLOPS+63%	8.659 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1720 MHz	2416 MHz+40%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega II does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6650M carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 6650M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 285.7% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6650M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	864 GB/s+286%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+500%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
Encoder	VCE 4.1	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 7.2	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 119.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
TDP	475W	120W-75%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	650W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	120mm	0mm
Slots	4	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	32.8	126.4+285%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6650M (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II	Radeon RX 6650M
MSRP	$2199	—
Codename	Vega 20	Navi 23
Release	June 3 2019	January 4 2022
Ranking	#138	#148

Search Radeon Pro Vega II on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6650M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.