CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile).
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) reaches 11,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1890 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 96.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407 | 11,353 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+8% | 1890 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has 6 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+67% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)'s 115W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-22% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7+28% | 98.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600M and GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
