Radeon PRO W6600M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600M.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) reaches 11,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1410 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407 | 11,715+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+100% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS+188% | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+44% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the Radeon PRO W6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 40W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7 | 292.9+131% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
