
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Quadro P4000

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6600M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon PRO W6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600M.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro P4000

Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the Quadro P4000 reaches 11,431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407 | 11,431 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS+37% | 5.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+37% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 672 KB+31% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-14% | 105W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7+16% | 108.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $815 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $290 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GP104 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #240 | #239 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















