
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Quadro M6000 24GB

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6600M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon PRO W6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M6000 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (24 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600M.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M6000 24GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro M6000 24GB

Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407 | 11,625+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS+7% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+83% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.1 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 41.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 317 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7+172% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $600 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GM200 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #240 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















