Radeon PRO W6600M vs Quadro P5200
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6600M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P5200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro P5200
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407 | 11,650+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+16% | 1746 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 960 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-10% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7+9% | 116.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $240 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GP104 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #240 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600M and Quadro P5200
