Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7500

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

113%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

107%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

100%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

99%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

99%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

98%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

97%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

89%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

89%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

89%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

81%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

80%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

75%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

74%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO W7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 69% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+69%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-69%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $401 for the Radeon PRO W7500, it costs 81% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 216.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+216.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($401)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 69%. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	13,298+69%	7,869
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+100%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.19 TFLOPS+309%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+2%	1665 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	512 KB	896 KB+75%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon PRO W7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCN 4.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 216mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7500	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	70W-7%	75W
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	216mm	229mm
Height	115mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	190.0+81%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $401, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 81.3% less ($326 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 216% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).