
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,298 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌59.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+24.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,298 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌59.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 24.7%. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298 | 16,581+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2655 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 80.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 216mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-58% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 216mm | 240mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0+89% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 37.3% less ($160 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 98.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $269-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0 | 61.6+99% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #192 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













