Radeon PRO W7900 vs Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (48 GB vs 32 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7800.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,200 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 37% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 53.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211+4% | 27,180 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+37% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+36% | 45.25 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz | 2525 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 192+50% | 128 |
| TMUs | 384+37% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96+37% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+50% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+50% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 12.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 260W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 104.5+9% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 and now averages $2200. The Radeon PRO W7800 costs 37.1% less ($1300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon PRO W7800 offers 53.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $2499-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $2200-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 12.4+53% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #26 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 and Radeon PRO W7800
