Radeon PRO W7900
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W7900 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$3,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 and the RTX 6000 Ada Generation reaches 28,454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 568.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211 | 28,454 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 18176+196% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz | 2505 MHz |
| ROPs | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 384 | 568+48% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 17.8 MB+493% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96 | 142+48% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 48 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 11.1% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s | 960 GB/s+11% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 1.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W-2% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 came in at $3999, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7900 was 41.2% cheaper ($2800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W7900 offers 69% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999-41% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+69% | 4.2 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | AD102 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #26 | #24 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
