
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,750 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 112.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($1,750) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 6.4%. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 280.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211 | 30,020+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8960+46% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+139% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+74% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 384+37% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 8.8 MB+193% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96+37% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 123.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 70W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 428.9+349% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999 and now averages $1750. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition costs 50% less ($1750 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 17.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 112.3% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $1999-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $1750-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 17.2+112% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GB203 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #26 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















