
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

Radeon PRO W7900
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 371.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 295W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌344.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌168.2% higher power demand at 295W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6.2%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+6% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+668% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2495 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 160 | 384+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 3 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 96+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 91.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+185% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) came in at $900, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 77.5% cheaper ($3099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 369% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-77% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.3+369% | 7.1 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #201 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














