Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1110 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 371.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Draws 110W instead of 295W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

  • 84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 344.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
  • 168.2% higher power demand at 295W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7900 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) instead at 29,964 vs 28,211, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023), a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 96 vs 40 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,099 cheaper on MSRP at $900 vs $3,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 371.9% (33.3 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1440p and 4K, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, Radeon PRO W7900 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6.2%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 320 Tensor cores.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score
29,964+6%
28,211
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
6144+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+668%
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2495 MHz+60%
ROPs
64
192+200%
TMUs
160
384+140%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB
3 MB+20%
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
40
96+140%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
48 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
4th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 91.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
TDP
110W-63%
295W
Recommended PSU
650W-13%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
3
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
272.4+185%
95.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) came in at $900, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 77.5% cheaper ($3099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 369% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP
$900-77%
$3999
Performance per Dollar
33.3+369%
7.1
Codename
TU104
Navi 31
Release
May 27 2019
April 13 2023
Ranking
#201
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.