Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 125.1% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+125.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-125.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 94% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 644.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+644.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 125.1%. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211+125% | 12,535 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+574% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+40% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+500% | 32 |
| TMUs | 384+380% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96+380% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 285.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+286% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 130W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 66°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 94% less ($3291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 640.7% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $249-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $209-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 60.0+641% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA106 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #26 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
