
Radeon PRO W7900 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1139.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1139.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6.2%. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 320.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211 | 29,964+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+668% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+60% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+200% | 64 |
| TMUs | 384+140% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96+140% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 91.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 110W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 272.4+185% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 and now averages $300. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 91.4% less ($3200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 1133.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $900-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $300-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 99.9+1133% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | TU104 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #26 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















