Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,100 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 69% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 231.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($1,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti reaches 29,395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 336.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211 | 29,395+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 10752+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+53% | 40 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+34% | 1860 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+71% | 112 |
| TMUs | 384+14% | 336 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 10.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96+14% | 84 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 41.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 336mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W-34% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-12% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 336mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6+46% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 and now averages $1100. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti costs 68.6% less ($2400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 26.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 229.6% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $1999-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $1100-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 26.7+230% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA102 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #26 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
