
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs FirePro 3D V7800

Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank 118 and the FirePro 3D V7800 is on rank 270, so the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V7800.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V7800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 12.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and FirePro 3D V7800

Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the FirePro 3D V7800 reaches 1,867 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro 3D V7800 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,871 | 1,867 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+179% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the FirePro 3D V7800's 274W — a 154.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 254mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-87% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 254mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+687% | 6.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $40. The FirePro 3D V7800 costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) — the FirePro 3D V7800 offers 12.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-80% | $759 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $40-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6 | 46.7+12% |
| Codename | Lexa | Tahiti |
| Release | June 4 2017 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #702 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















