G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017

Why buy it

✅48.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,890 vs 1,871), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 99.3% (12.6 vs 6.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4130 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
G3D Mark Score	1,871	1,890+1%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.248 TFLOPS	1.348 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	1219 MHz+16%	1053 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4130. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
TDP	35W-30%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	53.5+42%	37.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 6.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 100% better value.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP	$149-50%	$300
Performance per Dollar	12.6+100%	6.3
Codename	Lexa	Baffin
Release	June 4 2017	March 1 2017
Ranking	#702	#697

Search Radeon Pro WX 2100 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.