Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank 118 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 is on rank 186, so the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 2100.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $100), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 120% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+120%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,871 | 1,890+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 1.348 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz+16% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+42% | 37.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 55% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 120.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-55% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6+120% | 18.9 |
| Codename | Lexa | Baffin |
| Release | June 4 2017 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #702 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Radeon Pro WX 4130
