Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7500

2021Core: 1941 MHzBoost: 2450 MHz
RX family
·······

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • Delivers 53.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 175W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX 7500

2021

Why buy it

  • 153.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 53.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $229 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 175W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 153.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,873 vs 1,871), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 2100 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 36 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 53.5% (12.6 vs 8.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 7500 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 7500

The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Radeon RX 7500 reaches 1,873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 2450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon RX 7500
G3D Mark Score
1,871
1,873
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
2304+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.248 TFLOPS
11.29 TFLOPS+805%
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2450 MHz+101%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
144+350%
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR 3 + AFMF

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon RX 7500
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 carries 512 MB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 7500. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon RX 7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon RX 7500
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon RX 7500
TDP
35W-80%
175W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
53.5+400%
10.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 34.9% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 53.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7500 (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon RX 7500
MSRP
$149-35%
$229
Performance per Dollar
12.6+54%
8.2
Codename
Lexa
Navi 22
Release
June 4 2017
June 9 2021
Ranking
#702
#90

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.