Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon RX 7500
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank #118 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7500 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 7500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $229 for the Radeon RX 7500, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 408.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+408.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Radeon RX 7500
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon RX 7500
The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Radeon RX 7500 reaches 1,873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,871 | 1,873 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2304+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+805% |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 2450 MHz+101% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 144+350% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7500 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 has 512 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon RX 7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-80% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+400% | 10.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229 and now averages $229. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 80.3% less ($184 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 407.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-35% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-80% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6+407% | 8.2 |
| Codename | Lexa | Navi 22 |
| Release | June 4 2017 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #702 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Radeon RX 7500
