Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 450

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 450

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 450 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • 11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 450

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 2100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 47% HIGHER MSRP
    $219 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 450 instead at 1,887 vs 1,871, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $219, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.7% (12.6 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R7 450

The Radeon R7 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,887 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Radeon R7 450 reaches 1,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 512 (Radeon R7 450). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 450).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon R7 450
G3D Mark Score
1,871
1,887
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.248 TFLOPS+52%
0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon R7 450
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 450.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon R7 450
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 450's 55W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 250W (Radeon R7 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon R7 450
TDP
35W-36%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
53.5+56%
34.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon R7 450 launched at $219. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 32% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 450) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 46.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 2100 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100Radeon R7 450
MSRP
$149-32%
$219
Performance per Dollar
12.6+47%
8.6
Codename
Lexa
Cape Verde
Release
June 4 2017
July 6 2016
Ranking
#702
#667

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.