GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 645

200

1,880

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

1,871

0.0%

Radeon HD 6750

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

99%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

99%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

96%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

94%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

87%

#103

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1176%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

100%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

100%

#124

Radeon Pro W5500X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

98%

#125

Quadro T2000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $75

97%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

91%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

88%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $45), it costs 56% less, resulting in a 126.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+126.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 645 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 2100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score	1,880	1,871
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	352	512+45%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	1.248 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	44+38%	32
L1 Cache	704 KB+450%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_0)+9%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 147mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP	200W	35W-83%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	147mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	9.4	53.5+469%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 55.6% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 126% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).