
GeForce GTX 645 vs GeForce GTX 580M

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 580M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 580M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 580M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 645 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and GeForce GTX 580M

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce GTX 580M
The GeForce GTX 580M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,878 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the GeForce GTX 580M reaches 1,878 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 580M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 580M). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,878 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 0.9523 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 64+45% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 580M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 580M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 580M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 580M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 580M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 580M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 580M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 18.8+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GF100 | GF114 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | June 28 2011 |
| Ranking | #618 | #700 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















