
GeForce GTX 645 vs RadeonT Vega 8

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

RadeonT Vega 8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT Vega 8 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The RadeonT Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RadeonT Vega 8 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 645 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT Vega 8 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and RadeonT Vega 8

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

RadeonT Vega 8
The RadeonT Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,894 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the RadeonT Vega 8 reaches 1,894 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the RadeonT Vega 8 uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 448 (RadeonT Vega 8). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (RadeonT Vega 8).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,894 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 448+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+99% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+57% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT Vega 8 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (RadeonT Vega 8). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs VCN 1.0 (RadeonT Vega 8). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT Vega 8).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the RadeonT Vega 8's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The RadeonT Vega 8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1W (RadeonT Vega 8). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 42.1+348% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RadeonT Vega 8 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The RadeonT Vega 8 costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs Infinity (RadeonT Vega 8) — the RadeonT Vega 8 offers Infinity% better value. The RadeonT Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Cezanne |
| Release | May 31 2010 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #618 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















