GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 645

1 GB 200

1,880

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

1,890

+0.5%

Radeon HD 8750M

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 645

2010

Why buy it

✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 645 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 645 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 4130 instead at 1,890 vs 1,880, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 645 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 645 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.9% (12.5 vs 6.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
G3D Mark Score	1,880	1,890
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	352	640+82%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	1.348 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	44+10%	40
L1 Cache	704 KB+340%	160 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 645 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4130 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 645 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4130. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_0)+9%
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
TDP	200W	50W-75%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	147mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	9.4	37.8+302%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 645 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 645 was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 6.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 98.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4130 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP	$150-50%	$300
Performance per Dollar	12.5+98%	6.3
Codename	GF100	Baffin
Release	May 31 2010	March 1 2017
Ranking	#618	#697

Search GeForce GTX 645 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.