
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 645 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $35), it costs 43% less, resulting in a 73.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+73.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon HD 7700-serie

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,899+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 2048+482% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+343% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 128+191% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4+24% | 7.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 42.9% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 73.1% better value. The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-6% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-43% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.0+73% | 54.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 31 2010 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #618 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















