
GeForce GTX 645

Radeon R7 450
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon R7 450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon R7 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon R7 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅96.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
Radeon R7 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 645 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌46% HIGHER MSRP$219 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon R7 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon R7 450
The Radeon R7 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,887 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon R7 450 reaches 1,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 512 (Radeon R7 450). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,887 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+4% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+450% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 645 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 450 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 645 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 450. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 450) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 450's 55W — a 113.7% difference. The Radeon R7 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 250W (Radeon R7 450). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 55W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 34.3+265% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 645 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 450 launched at $219. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 645 was 31.5% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 450) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 45.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 450 (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-32% | $219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+45% | 8.6 |
| Codename | GF100 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 31 2010 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #618 | #667 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















