
GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon R7 450

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 450 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon R7 450 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 645.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $35), it costs 43% less, resulting in a 74.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+74.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and Radeon R7 450

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon R7 450
The Radeon R7 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,887 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon R7 450 reaches 1,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 512 (Radeon R7 450). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,887 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+4% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+450% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 450 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 450) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 450's 55W — a 113.7% difference. The Radeon R7 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 250W (Radeon R7 450). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 55W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 34.3+265% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R7 450 launched at $219 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 42.9% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 53.9 (Radeon R7 450) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 74.4% better value. The Radeon R7 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 645 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-32% | $219 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-43% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.0+74% | 53.9 |
| Codename | GF100 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 31 2010 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #618 | #667 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















