Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Moore Threads MTT S70
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank #118 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The Radeon Pro WX 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 68% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 209.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+209.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Moore Threads MTT S70
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Moore Threads MTT S70 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,871 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 3584+600% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+819% |
| ROPs | 16 | 224+1300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 224+600% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3.5 MB+1300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3.5 MB+1300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 145.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 285mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+529% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 and now averages $140. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 67.9% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 210.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-57% | $345 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-68% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6+210% | 13.4 |
| Codename | Lexa | Chunxiao |
| Release | June 4 2017 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #702 | #694 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Moore Threads MTT S70
