Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 645

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank #118 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

99%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

99%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

96%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

94%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

87%

#103

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1176%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

100%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

100%

#124

Radeon Pro W5500X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

98%

#125

Quadro T2000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $75

97%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

91%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

88%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $45), it costs 56% less, resulting in a 126.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+126.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 2100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 645 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and GeForce GTX 645

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
G3D Mark Score	1,871	1,880
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+45%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.248 TFLOPS+46%	0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	44+38%
L1 Cache	128 KB	704 KB+450%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
DirectX	12 (12_0)+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 147mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 2100	GeForce GTX 645
TDP	35W-83%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	147mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	53.5+469%	9.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 55.6% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 126% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).