Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank 118 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 is on rank 263, so the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics P630, it costs 10% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 12.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Intel UHD Graphics P630
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,871+1% | 1,848 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS+171% | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz+2% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Gen 9.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 80% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 123.2+130% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 12.4% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 2100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-10% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6+12% | 37.0 |
| Codename | Lexa | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Release | June 4 2017 | May 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #702 | #640 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 2100 and Intel UHD Graphics P630
