Radeon R7 240
VS
GRID K220Q

Radeon R7 240 vs GRID K220Q

AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
VS

GRID K220Q

2014Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank 103 and the GRID K220Q is on rank 299, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
555%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
533%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
527%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
525%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
522%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
515%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
514%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
509%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
507%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
501%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
500%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
491%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
491%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
94%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
93%
#88
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
612%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
96%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
90%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
90%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
90%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
87%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
86%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
85%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
84%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
83%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
81%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K220Q

#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
100%
#283
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7615%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
100%
#300
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
100%
#301
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
98%
#302
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
93%
#303
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
91%
#304
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
89%
#305
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
89%
#307
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
88%
#308
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
88%
#309
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
87%
#310
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
85%
#311
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
84%
#312
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
82%
#313
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K220Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (265mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 163.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+163.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and GRID K220Q

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

NVIDIA

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the GRID K220Q reaches 912 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID K220Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 1,536 (GRID K220Q). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q).

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
G3D Mark Score
902
912+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1536+380%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.448 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+411%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
128+540%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K220Q has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) vs 512 KB (GRID K220Q) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the GRID K220Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (GRID K220Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
TDP
30W-87%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
265mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
30.1+634%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID K220Q launched at $469 and now averages $40. The Radeon R7 240 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 22.8 (GRID K220Q) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 163.6% better value. The GRID K220Q is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID K220Q
MSRP
$69-85%
$469
Avg Price (30d)
$15-63%
$40
Performance per Dollar
60.1+164%
22.8
Codename
Oland
GK104
Release
October 8 2013
July 2 2014
Ranking
#911
#907