
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Vega 3

Radeon R7 240
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank #103 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Vega 3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 240 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 3.
| Insight | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 240 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and Radeon Vega 3

Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

Radeon Vega 3
The Radeon Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the Radeon Vega 3 reaches 892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 3). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 902+1% | 892 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 448+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.448 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+280% |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1900 MHz+144% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon Vega 3's 45W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-33% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 30.1+52% | 19.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon Vega 3 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 3 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3) — the Radeon Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Oland | Cezanne |
| Release | October 8 2013 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #911 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















