Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 M440

AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M440

2016Core: 891 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 M440 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 M440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 M440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $231 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 335.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M440 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M440

2016

Why buy it

  • 5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 334.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M440 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 240 instead at 902 vs 901, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $231 cheaper on MSRP at $69 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 335.3% (13.1 vs 3.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M440 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 M440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Radeon R7 M440

The Radeon R7 M440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 891 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 901 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the Radeon R7 M440 reaches 901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M440 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M440). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 0.5702 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M440).

FeatureRadeon R7 240Radeon R7 M440
G3D Mark Score
902
901
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.448 TFLOPS
0.5702 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
20
20
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 240Radeon R7 M440
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 240 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M440 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M440. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M440) — the Radeon R7 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 240Radeon R7 M440
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M440's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M440). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 240Radeon R7 M440
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
30.1+151%
12.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 240 came in at $69, while the Radeon R7 M440 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 240 was 77% cheaper ($231 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 336.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M440 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 240Radeon R7 M440
MSRP
$69-77%
$300
Performance per Dollar
13.1+337%
3.0
Codename
Oland
Meso
Release
October 8 2013
May 15 2016
Ranking
#911
#912

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.