Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R7 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R7 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R7 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
58% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 80W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (909 vs 902), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $69 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 56.8% (13.1 vs 8.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4770 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R7 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4770 scores 909 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4770 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240).

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R7 240
G3D Mark Score	909	902
Architecture	TeraScale	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+100%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.96 TFLOPS+114%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+60%	20
L1 Cache	128 KB+60%	80 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R7 240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4770 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R7 240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4770 draws 80W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 4770) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R7 240
TDP	80W	30W-63%
Recommended PSU	400W	300W-25%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	203mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	72°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.4	30.1+164%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4770 came in at $109, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69. On MSRP, Radeon R7 240 was 36.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 57.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 240 (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R7 240
MSRP	$109	$69-37%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	13.1+58%
Codename	RV740	Oland
Release	April 28 2009	October 8 2013
Ranking	#908	#911

Search Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.