Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
10.1% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅33.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (935 vs 909), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13.3% (9.4 vs 8.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4770 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4770 scores 909 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4770 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	909	935+3%
Architecture	TeraScale	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.96 TFLOPS+6%	0.9085 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4770 draws 80W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 4770) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R5 340
TDP	80W	50W-38%
Recommended PSU	400W	300W-25%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	203mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	72°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.4	18.7+64%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4770 came in at $109, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R5 340 was 9.2% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 13.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 4770	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	$109	$99-9%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	9.4+13%
Codename	RV740	Lexa
Release	April 28 2009	April 20 2017
Ranking	#908	#773

Search Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.